A colleague draw my attention to this BBC news item today, which quotes an “online entrepreneur” saying “millions of pounds worth of business is probably being lost each week” in online retail due to the issue he raises (more on that later).
I hope that readers of that BBC piece aren’t tempted to call their online colleagues and suggest there’s a new trick to help increase online sales because they will be disappointed. The article is very low on evidence, and as the sites it names seem to be connected to the company of the “online entrepreneur” there’s a question is to whether the whole piece is just a successful bit of PR cooked up to promote the name of a new online store for women’s tights.
All too often though, when talking to new clients about their web performance, aspirations and activity to date, I do hear of time and money being spent on ideas that whilst not wrong as such, aren’t supported by evidence form the actual website in question. The most common end result is that well intentioned effort has produced a poor ROI in terms of any change to online sales.
The BBC article quotes Mr Dunstone saying that online retailers can double their sales by addressing ‘simple spelling mistakes’, based on the evidence of… just one website, and one that is linked to Mr Dunstone. Humm. That is not evidence – and anyone rushing to spend time and money based on it risks seeing very little return for their efforts.
But it doesn’t have to be that way – it doesn’t have to be tricky to get the right evidence for your specific site and to ensure you maximise the time and money spent on your online store for a couple of good reasons…
Continue reading →